Who benefits from the assassination of Rafiq Hariri?

From Psychological Warfare, 1954 edition

"A nation preparing to break the peace frequently gets out peace propaganda of the most blatant sort, trying to make sure that its own audience (as well as the world) will believe the real responsibility to lie in the victim he attacks. Hitler protested his love of Norwegian neutrality; then he hit, claiming that he was protecting it from the British."

Who benefited from 911? Was it Iraq and Afghanistan? Who benefits from the assassination of Rafiq Hariri? What nation in the middle gains the most by destabilizing Lebanon even more?

It is also very funny that Mr. Bush and associates are pushing the "let's all make nice" program to prospective allies once again and getting the general public's head pre-primed with who the good guys and bad guys are. Condoleeza Rice on her Euro-Propaganda tour has made attempts to position Iran for UN sanctions (Bushites need to get on the record who the bad guys are before they kill them). And now, what do we see, the fingerprints of a highly sophisticated, highly organized bomb attack designed to destabilize another country in the Middle East. Hmmm! I wonder who that benefits? Let's get it on the record that the Bushites are already blaming it on Syria (pulling the American Ambassador cannot be seen as anything but blatant accusation by those who have eyes with which to see).

This most definitely has Anlgo-Mossad Fingerprints all over it.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/Description.asp?Da=2/16/2005&Cat=14&Num=001
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/signs20050215.htm